The population of Shedville is watching the occupy movement with skepticism but also foolish hope.
Without structure Occupy Wall Street is a blank upon which you can project your hopes and fears. I hope it is not just a move to re-set the thermostat on The Air-Conditioned Nightmare.
Therefore I was cheered by an article in the New York Observer: Occupy Wall Street and the Poetry of Now-Time –love the head line.
Of course we asked them about what everyone outside this movement—especially members of the media—seems want to talk about, and nobody on the inside is particularly concerned with: What do you all want? What are the demands? How do you know when you’ve won and can go home?
The poets were polite. They tried to answer. They were tired, as everyone is down there. Running on pure adrenaline. But these were the wrong questions, the ones you ask when you don’t yet get it. These were the questions of the world outside the park—the world of prose. Occupy Wall Street is actually, it turns out, occurring in the realm of poetry and spirit. It’s a sort of waking dream. Which is why it’s so strangely powerful and cannot be sneered away or shoveled over with cynicism (not that we didn’t try) or kettled into history, and may even survive the winter in New York.
…
Mr. Marinovich marveled at the “immediate, urgent intimacy” he felt in the park, among the occupiers. “It’s completely natural and unforced,” he said, “and it has so much to do with the absence of money as a center, because when that’s not in the center, what is in the center we don’t know, and into that opening everything can flow.
Michael Albert reports on long term occupations.
But as days passed, and then weeks, it got too familiar. And it wasn’t obvious to folks what more they could do. There weren’t tasks to undertake. We weren’t being born anymore, we were dying. It was hard. For many it was impossible to keep learning and keep contributing. There was a will, but there was not a way. Folks didn’t have meaningful things to do that made them feel part of a worthy project. We felt, in time, only part of a mass of people.
After a time, many asked, why should I stay and listen to boring talks? Why should I be hugely uncomfortable and cut off from family and work, if I have nothing to do that is constructive, nothing that is empowering, nothing that furthers worthy aims? And so people started to attend less, and then to leave.
…
What is the solution, I asked, in each new city, and we discussed possible answers.
Occupy but better yet, self manage, I was told. The former option is basically passive – the latter is active and yields tasks and opportunities to contribute.
Have occupations self manage and create innovations artistically, socially, and politically. Have occupations occupy indoors, not just outside. It is a leap, perhaps, but not much of one. In Barcelona and Madrid – some have tentatively begun occupying abandoned apartments and other buildings
He uses the term “self-manage” which I think is OK. I’m toying with “artful action”.
When I lived in The Nederlands I was struck cross-eyed by squatters taking possession of unoccupied buildings. But, but, but, but, I sputtered, but, IT’S PRIVATE PROPERTY. It took me quite a while to calm down and think about what is really important. In some cases the state allowed the squats to develop and I visited one that had been turned into apartments.
I think the concept of occupation offers a wealth of playful possibilities. However let’s give people time to adjust and let’s be artful.
Advocate occupations of abandoned property by imitating Jericho and march around the property singing. Do your homework, and do your publicity. Who is benefiting from that property being vacant? How could you get the use of a property from a supporter? What would it take to find a supporter to buy the property in the spirit of Random Acts of Kindness? Some $300,000 dollars has been donated. Use it to rent to buy and fix the property up.
Demonstrate discipline, demonstrate working class values, and use the resulting HQ as a post from which to occupy public spaces long term by visiting consistently and “occupy to rules”, making obvious the constraints officaldom puts on free speech.